Workforce Demand & Capacity Lab

An interactive TA capacity-planning model that translates hiring demand, recruiter availability, and delivery constraints into executive tradeoff decisions.

Demand vs capacity

Weighted units by month

Demand Capacity Gap

A line chart comparing monthly weighted demand units and capacity units.

Weighted demand

94

Total Sep–Feb

Capacity units

78

Total Sep–Feb

Unit gap

16

Demand minus capacity

Aggregate utilization

121%

Demand ÷ capacity across Sep–Feb

Model context

Planning scope for the active synthetic scenario.

Decision
Can the six-month hiring plan be delivered under the selected capacity assumptions?
Audience
CEO, CFO, People leader, and Talent Acquisition leader
Horizon
September–February
Data
Synthetic portfolio scenario
Output
Monthly feasibility, capacity gaps, and modeled tradeoffs

Monthly operating view

Formula-driven synthetic scenario

MonthDemandCapacityGapUtilizationStatus
Aggregate947816121%Peak-month status drives decision

Aggregate utilization = total demand ÷ total capacity across Sep–Feb. The executive status uses the worst monthly feasibility result under the selected guardrails.

Tradeoff options

Select one to preview its decision impact.

Executive decision memo

At risk

Capacity tradeoff required

What this demonstrates

Synthetic portfolio model. No candidate, employee, or employer-confidential data.